Author: Yuval Noah Harari
Links: Amazon|Indiebound |Goodreads
Summary: A surprisingly philosophical, funny, and thought-provoking trip through human history.
I think I picked this up because of a comparison to Jared Diamond and that could be why I expected a focus on the early years of humanity’s existence. In actuality, the author spends approximately equal time on the years before and after each of three major revolutions in human thought: the agricultural, cognitive, and scientific revolutions. I was also surprised by how philosophical this book was. Instead of simply relating a factual history of humanity, the author asks tough questions, discussing the foundations of current belief systems and wondering whether or not each of the major revolutions he discusses really made people happier.
In a final surprise when I added this review to my book-tracking spreadsheet, I discovered that this was the first work of translated nonfiction I’ve read (yay!). I must offer some serious kudos to the author and the translator (perhaps one and the same? I can’t find any translator listed) for keeping a sense of humor alive through the translation. There were many parts of this book that were quirky or funny in a way that made me smile and made this book a pleasure to read. I suspect that’s something that is very hard to achieve across a language barrier. The fun facts in this book also contributed to my enjoyment and I’d recommend it to my many readers who share my love of the an interesting bit of trivia.
Despite my surprise at the philosophical tone of the book, it was largely something I enjoyed. The author made me question basic assumptions, such as whether or not capitalism should be considered a religion and whether or not the agricultural revolution was good for the individual. On occasion, I did feel as though the author went out of his way to give traditional religions a hard time. Even as someone who is not religious, the jabs at religion bothered me when they didn’t contribute something useful to the book. However, overall, I felt like the author was very evenhanded in his treatment of some difficult questions. Even when I thought his personal opinion was clear, he usually gave the other side a fair shake.
This book was something completely different. Although it does share the scope of its questions with Jared Diamond’s work, it strays more into the philosophical and more into the modern era. This could be a good or a bad thing, depending on the reader and their expectations. This was one of the few times when I enjoyed a book being very different from what I expected. I liked the way it made me question things that seem obvious and wasn’t offended by the author’s lack of reverence and willingness to dissect all aspects of our culture. If you like Jared Diamond’s books, are interested in the very early history of humanity, or just want to read something thought-provoking, I’d highly recommend this. If you are religious, I’m not sure this will be your cup of tea.
Are you typically bothered by author’s inserting their personal opinions into non-memoir nonfiction? Even if they agree with you?